REVIEWER POLICY

The International Journal of Arts, Commerce & Education (IJACE) follows a rigorous and transparent peer-review process to ensure the quality, credibility, and academic integrity of all published research. Reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the journal’s high standards by providing constructive, unbiased, and timely evaluations of submitted manuscripts.

Key aspects of the reviewer policy include:

• Selection of Reviewers: Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, experience, and subject knowledge to ensure fair and thorough evaluation.
• Double-Blind Review: The journal follows a double-blind review process in which both authors and reviewers remain anonymous, ensuring impartial assessment.
• Confidentiality: Reviewers must maintain strict confidentiality of manuscripts and must not use or disclose any information for personal or professional gain.
• Ethical Responsibility: Reviewers are expected to identify potential ethical concerns such as plagiarism, data manipulation, or undisclosed conflicts of interest and report them to the editorial team.
• Timely Feedback: Reviewers should provide constructive and detailed feedback within the specified timeframe to support efficient editorial decisions.
• Conflict of Interest: Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest that could influence their objectivity in evaluating a manuscript.

By adhering to this policy, the International Journal of Arts, Commerce & Education (IJACE) ensures that all published articles meet the highest standards of scholarly excellence while supporting authors through meaningful and professional feedback.